|
Archaeological
excavation is expected to provide, if methodologically sound,
a detailed image of the physical remains of the past encountered,
and to further enable us to reconstruct them beyond their
state of preservation. The largest set of recorded data pertains
to spatial information, both descriptive and by image. In
trying to overcome the problems of representing three-dimensional
space, archaeologists have been limited, in quality and quantity,
by the fact that the information would be processed manually,
and in post-excavation period. Now that digital recording
and data processing are common in excavation, we would seem
to have finally mastered the tool, which permits to reconstruct
and visualize our complex stratigraphic situations any time.
But - is that achievable without changes in the very concepts
and procedures of data recording?
The paper intends to discuss some of the related problems.
Our emphasis is on ways to obtain data sets, which can later
be used in surface and volume modelling, study of physical
relations, surface morphology, spatial analysis etc.. New/modified
technologies are necessary, but are not sufficient; above
all, a serious reevaluation of archaeological procedures in
preparing the elements to be recorded is needed, and there
must be real time control of the results.
A case of intrasite photogrametric data recovery is used to
demonstrate how adequate information to reconstruct stratigraphy
can be obtained and evaluated in the field, to be used later
as a source in post-excavation analysis. Resulting images
can also be merged with the remote sensing generated data
for the adjacent areas.
|